Proposed Changes to Constitution
The Rangatira Committee has proposed a number of changes to the club constitution will be presented at the next AGM and voted upon in accordance with rule 16 of the current constitution.
The committee welcomes discussion and feedback on the proposed changes.
A substantive changes document has been prepared to help guide you through the various proposed changes, and the reasoning behind them. Please review these changes and provide your feedback and recommendations in the comments section provided below so that we can take these into consideration for the final document which will be presented at the next AGM on 29 March 2010.
Documents in Word Format
Rangatira Constitution - Proposed 2010.doc
Rangatira_Constitution_2010_Substantive_Changes.doc
Constitution April 2000.doc (current constitution)
Documents in PDF Format
Rangatira Constitution - Proposed 2010.pdf
Rangatira_Constitution_2010_Substantive_Changes.pdf
Constitution April 2000.pdf (current constitution)
Posted by Rob Yallop on 21 February 2010 at 08:13 PM
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 17 March 2010 at 07:18 AM
Well done in bringing the constitution up to date.
I notice reference to Midweek members having the same voting privileges as Ordinary members, but the voting privileges of Ordinary members are not defined. Booking privileges are also limited for Midweek - but not defined for Ordinary to enable a determination of the differences.
The rights and privileges of Ordinary members may need to be defined
cheers
Peter
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 21 March 2010 at 01:38 PM
Peter
Thanks for your feedback. Booking privileges and rates are set by the Committee from time to time, and are posted on our web site - http://www.rangatiraskiclub.co.nz/index.php/site/static/category/mid-week_membership/.
To remove the ambiguity raised in your blog, I propose an addition to “Interpretation” rule 2 to read -
“Member” shall be any person as defined in rule 5, and shall be subject to limitation of privileges (if any) as defined in rule 5.
In addition, I propose that the word “voting” be removed from the definition of mid week, as a mid week member is entitled to all priveleges of an orinary member, other than the fees they pay.
Regards
Vincent Papesch
Page 1 of 1 pages
